Friday, August 19, 2011

Noyes Whitney Equation


                                                      SAMARTH PHARMA
Noyes Whitney Equation
Question
Using Noyes Whitney equation, explain how certain factors affect the rate of mass transfer of solute particles into a solvent (rate of dissolution).

Answer:
Noyes Whitney equation states that the rate of mass transfer of solute particles into the continuous phase (rate of dissolution) is equal to

dm/dt = DACs/h
where dm/dt = rate of mass transfer / rate of dissolution
          D = diffusion coefficient
          A= surface area of solute particles
         Cs = concentration of solute particles at the boundary layer
         h = height of the boundary layer

Noyes Whitney equation states that the rate of dissolution is directly proportional to the the surface area of the solute particle, diffusion coefficient and the concentration of solute particles present at the boundary layer. Simply put, the higher the value of the diffusion coefficient, the greater the surface area and the more concentrated the solute particles at the boundary layers are, the higher the rate of dissolution. On the other hand, according to the equation the height of the boundary layer is indirectly proportional to the rate of dissolution, so the lower the height the faster the rate of dissolution.

In short, the factors that affect the rate of dissolution according to Noyes Whitney equation are: the Diffusion coefficient, the surface area of the solute particle, the concentration of the solute particles at the boundary layer and the height of the boundary layer.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

CHROMETOGRAPHIC FINGERPRINTING

Introduction

The construction of chromatographic fingerprints plays an important role in the quality control of complex herbal medicines. Chemical fingerprints obtained by chromatographic techniques are strongly recommended for the purpose of quality control of herbal medicines, since they might represent appropriately the “chemical integrities” of the herbal medicines and therefore be used for authentication and identification of the herbal products. Based on the concept of phytoequivalence, the chromatographic fingerprints of herbal medicines could be utilized for addressing the problem of quality control of herbal medicines. By definition, a chromatographic fingerprint of a herbal medicine is, in practice, a chromatographic pattern of pharmacologically active and or chemically characteristic constituents present in the extract. This chromatographic profile should be featured by the fundamental attributions of “integrity” and “fuzziness” or “sameness” and “differences” so as to chemically represent the herbal medicines investigated. This suggest that chromatographic fingerprint can successfully demonstrate both “sameness” and “differences” between various samples and the authentication and identification of herbal medicines can be accurately conducted even if the number and/or concentration of chemically characteristic constituents are not very similar in different samples of herbal medicine. Thus chromatographic fingerprint should be considered to evaluate the quality of herbal medicines globally considering multiple constituents present in the herbal medicines.

Need for development of chromatographic fingerprints:

Herbal medicines have a long therapeutic history and are still serving many of the health needs of a large population of the world. But the quality control and quality assurance still remains a challenge because of the high variability of chemical components involved. Herbal drugs, singularly and in combinations, contain a myriad of compounds in complex matrices in which no single active constituent is responsible for the overall efficacy. This creates a challenge in establishing quality control standards for raw materials and standardization of finished herbal drugs. Traditionally only a few markers of pharmacologically active constituents were employed to assess the quality and authenticity of complex herbal medicines. However, the therapeutic effects of herbal medicines are based on the complex interaction of numerous ingredients in combination, which are totally different from those of chemical drugs. Thus many kinds of chemical fingerprint analysis methods to control the quality of herbal drugs have gradually come into being, such as thin layer chromatography, gas chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography etc. chromatographic fingerprint analysis of herbal drugs represents a comprehensive qualitative approach for the purpose of species authentication, evaluation of quality and ensuring the consistency and stability of herbal drugs and their related products. The entire pattern of compounds can then be evaluated to determine not only the presence or absence of desired markers or active constituents but the complete set of ratios of all detectable analytes. The chemical fingerprints obtained by chromatographic and electrophoretic techniques, especially by hyphenated chromatographies, are strongly recommended for the purpose of quality control of herbal medicines, since they might represent appropriately the “chemical integrities” of herbal medicines and therefore be used for authentication and identification of the herbal products.

Difficulties in development of chromatographic fingerprints for herbal medicines

When herbal drugs are considered for analysis, a large number of chemical components are involved and many of them are in low concentration. Chromatographic instruments and experimental conditions are difficult to reproduce during real analysis. Thus, the baseline and retention time shifts surely will be in existence from one chromatogram to another.  Many other problems associated with chromatographic fingerprints such as the occurrence of abnormal chromatograms from outlying herbal samples or experiments inevitably will be encountered. As a result, in order to obtain reliable chromatographic fingerprints, several data treatments would be needed during fingerprint analysis. 

Chemometric approaches and data processing for chromatographic fingerprint of herbal medicines:

Due to complexity of the chromatographic fingerprint and the irreproducibility of chromatographic instruments and experimental conditions, several chemometric approaches such as variance analysis, peak alignment, correlation analysis, and pattern recognition were employed to deal with the chromatographic fingerprint. Many mathematical algorithms are used for data processing in chemometric approaches. The basic principles for this approach are variation determination of common peaks/ regions and similarity comparison with similarity index and linear correlation coefficient. Similarity index and linear correlation coefficient can be used to compare common pattern of the chromatographic fingerprints obtained. In general, the mean or median of the chromatographic fingerprints under study is taken as the target and both are considered to be reliable. To facilitate the data processing, a software named Computer Aided Similarity Evaluation (CASE) has been developed. All programs of chemometric algorithms for CASE are coded in METLAB5.3 based on windows. Data loading, removing, cutting, smoothing, compressing, background and retention time shift correction, normalization, peak identification and matching, variation determination of common peaks/regions, similarity comparison, sample classification, and other data processes associated with the chromatographic fingerprint can be investigated with this software.

EXAMPLES:

6.1 HPTLC fingerprinting analysis of Adhatoda vasica Nees. : 

Vasicine and vasicinone type alkaloids are separate from the Adhatoda vasica Nees.
HPTLC fingerprinting shows the presence of five peaks. Two of them, which are major, correspond to vasicine and vasicinone  with superimposable UV spectrum.

a) System :

    CAMAG Instrument
    Automatic Plate Quoter
Linomat-5
Chromatogram Scanner with Wincats
Software

b) Operating Conditions:

        - Mobile Phase :          Methanol-Toluene-Dioxane-Ammonia (2:2:5:1)
        - Wavelength     :    270 nm
        - Slit Width    :    5 x 0.45 nm
        - Lamp Used       :    D2 and W
        - Scan Mode    :    Absorption-Reflection
    HPTLC fingerprint shows the presence of five peaks. Two of them, which are major, correspond to vasicine and vasicinone ( Rf 0.99 and 1.17) with superimposable UV-Spectrum.


2. Finger printing profile on Laboratory and market formulation of Rajanyadi churna was estimated by using HPTLC.

Both Photographs showing the comparative account of presence of various phytoconstituents in direct Methanolic extract of  different plants incorporated to that of the lab and marketed formulations.  Rf values of different constituents of individual plant Methanolic extracts are matching with the Rf values of formulation Methanolic extracts.

3. HPTLC Fingerprint Identification of Commercial Ginseng Medicine :
-    The roots of Ginseng have held the esteem of the Chinese as a “ cure-all medicinal herb for thousands of years. It turns out. Nowadays, in single or multi component pill, tablet, capsule, oral liquid and even cosmetics besides the crude drug itself. Commercial Ginseng is Classified in to white ginseng (dried naturally), red ginseng (steam-processed) (Panax ginseng, family; Araliaceae) produced mainly in china and Korea ( it can therefore be called ‘ Asian ginseng’); American Ginseng (P. quinquifolium) exported from eastern U.S.A and Canada via Hongkong as well as Notoginseng (Sachi) (P.notoginseng) native of South west China. A booming Market in Asian Ginseng, American Ginseng and various kinds of their preparations recent years put forward before the analysis a task for quality control with an effective, rapid and economic analysis method. As routine drug control, TLC/ HPTLC does undoubtedly meet the requirements and the fingerprint differentation taps further the potential of TLC from the view- Point of methodology.

-    As routine quality control of commercial Ginseng medicine, TLC/HPTLC is no doubt a rapid, effective and low-cost analytical method. HPTLC of Asian ginseng, American Ginseng, Notogineseng (Sanchi) and some of their preparations have been reported by Xie and Yan reliable experimental data and the reproducible chromatograms.

-    It has been reported that upon comprehension of more than hundreds of specimens of commercial radix Asian Ginseng [ Panax ginseng] and American Ginseng [ P. quinquifolium], as a whole, the HPTLC pattern of Ginseng are always simpler than that of Asian Ginseng. The fluorescence intensity of mani ginsenosides sports is much stronger than the miner saponin spots. In comtrast with American Ginseng, the minor ginsenosides in Asian Ginseng (red ginseng in particular) are easier to observe and the patterns are therefore mor complicated.

-    To optimize the condition of HPTLC and ginsenosides it has been reported that the solvent system, chloroform-Ethyl acetate-
Methanol-Water (15/40/22/10, stand over night at 8-100C(lower phase) has a highr resolution, better reproducibility of Rf values and more impact spots by comparison with the solvent systems established by the previous investigators and used in common. Detection and scanning in fluorescence mode after visualization with 5 % sulphuric acid/EtOH reagent by dipping technique improved and enhanced the sensitivity than that in absorbance mode most commonly used.

-    Sample pretreatment through adsorption clean-up step via a small basic alumina column followed by 1-butanol extraction instead of only butanol-extraction step made the chromatogram more clear, less background contamination and reduced the trailing of some ginsenosides spots. The experimental data demonstrated that the relative humidity(RH) has significant influence on the chromatographic behavior of ginseosides. The optimum RH for pre-equilibration of the precoated HPTLC plate is 42-47 % and the optimum temperature of development is at 25-280 C.

-    HPTLC fingerprints of ginseng preparations revealed the instability of ginsenosides in liquid dosage forms such as “shuan Bao Su” oral liquid (SBS-Liq) containing royal jelly and honey in admixture with ginseng extract. These findings raise questions about assessment of the stability of ginseng preparations from the standpoint of drug quality control. The results of an accelerated stability study reported by Xie and Yan elucidate the varius degradation processes of ginsenosides in the presence of royal jelly and/or honey. It also demonstrates that the HPTLC ginsenosides fingerprint can serve as stability indicating method, even when the chromatogram is not otherwise differentiated.

BUCCAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

Introduction

Amongst the various routes of drug delivery, oral route is the most preferred to the patient. However, disadvantages such as hepatic first pass metabolism and enzymatic degradation within the GI tract limits its use for certain drugs. Different absorptive mucosa are considered as potential site for drug administration.  e.g. nasal, rectal, vaginal, ocular and oral cavity  Noninvasive systemic administration.  Local targeting / systemic drug delivery
These drug delivery system utilize property of bioadhesion of certain water soluble polymers which become adhesive on hydration and hence can be used for targeting particular site. Buccal delivery is the administration of the drug via buccal mucosa (lining of the cheek) to the systemic circulation.

Concepts of Buccal Drug Delivery System

Mucoadhesive  polymers as drug delivery vehicles. The common principle underlying this drug administration route is the adhesion of the dosage form to the mucous layer until the polymer dissolves or the mucin replaces itself. Benefits for this route of drug administration are: prolonged drug delivery, targeted therapy and often improved bioavailability.

Bioadhesion and Mucoadhesion

Bioadhesion is the state in which two materials, (at least one of which is  biological in nature), are held together for a extended period of time by interfacial forces. The term bioadhesion implies attachment of drug-carrier system to specific biological location. This  biological surface can be epithelial tissue or the mucous coat on the surface of tissue.
If adhesive attachment is to mucous coat then phenomenon is referred as mucoadhesion. Mucoadhesion is defined as the interaction between a mucin surface and a synthetic or natural polymer. Mucoadhesion can also be explained on the basis of molecular interactions composed of attractive    (Vander Waal’s, Hydrogen bonding) and repulsive forces (Electrostatic, steric). For mucoadhesion to occur, the attractive interaction should be more than repulsive forces.
Biological membrane- the membrane of internal tract e.g.-GIT, buccal cavity, eye, nose ,vagina ,rectum are covered with a thick gel like structure know as mucin. All biological formulation interact with mucin layer during process of attachement , it act as a link between the adhesive and the membrane.
Mucous is a network of mucin glycoprotein that form a continuous layer that intimately cover the internal tract of body. Total weight of mucous secreted by globlet cell only contain less then 5% of glycoprotein. There are about 160-200 oligosaccharides side chain in the glycosylated region of the glycoprotein. Each oligosaccharides unit have 8-10 monosaccharides and terminal end of either sialic acid and L-fucose. Mucin have network of negative charge due to sialic acid , sulfate residue

Mechanism of Bioadhesion

The bioadhesion mainly depends upon nature of bioadhesive polymer. First stage involves an intimate contact between a bioadhesive & a membrane. Second stage involves penetration of the bioadhesive into tissue. At physiological pH the mucous network may carry negative charge because of presence of sialic acid & sulfate residue and this high charge density due to negative charge contributes significantly to bioadhesion.

Types  of  Mucosa

  1. Buccal mucosa
  2. Esophageal mucosa
  3. Gastric mucosa
  4. Intestinal mucosa
  5. Nasal mucosa
  6. Olfactory mucosa
  7. Oral mucosa
  8. Bronchial mucosa
  9. Uterine mucosa

Anatomy & Physiology of Oral Mucosa

The oral cavity is lined by thick dense & multilayered mucous membrane of highly vascularized nature. Drug penetrating into the membrane passes through net of capillaries & arteries and reaches the systemic circulation.
There are mainly three functional zones of oral mucosa:-
  1. Masticatory mucosa :- Covers gingiva/ hard palate regions, keratinized epithelium
  2. Mucous secreting region :- Consist of soft palate, floor of mouth underside of tongue & buccal mucosa. this region shows non-keratinized mucosa.
  3. Specialized mucosa :- consist of lip border & dorsal surface of tongue with high selective keratinization

Oral Mucosa

mucous membranes / mucosae / singular mucosa :-
These are linings of mostly endodermal origin, covered in epithelium, which are involved in absorption and secretion. They line various body cavities that are exposed to the external environment and internal organs. It is at several places continuous with skin – at the nostrils, the lips, the ears, the genital area, and the anus. The sticky thick fluid secreted by the mucous membranes and gland is termed mucus. The term mucous membrane refers to where they are found in the body  and not every mucous membrane secretes mucus.
Components of Oral Mucosa
  1. Epithelium
  2. Lamina  propria
  3. Smooth muscle/ Muscularis mucosa/ GI tract
Epithelium: Measure 100 cm2. It is a protective surface layer.
Layer of stratified squamous epithelium consist of
  1. S . Distendum
  2. S . filamentosum
  3. S . suprabasale

Structure of Mucous Membrane

  1. Fibrous covering.
  2. Divided fibers of longitudinal muscular coat
  3. Transverse muscular fibers
  4. Submucous or areolar  layer.
  5. Muscularis mucosae
  6. Mucous membrane with vessels and  part of a lymphoid nodule
  7. Stratified epithelial lining

Average Epithelium Thickness in Various Parts:-


RegionAverage epithelial thickness (mm)
Skin (mammary region)100 – 120
Hard palate250
Buccal mucosa500 – 600
Floor of mouth100 – 200

Advantages of Buccal Drug Delivery Systems

  1. Termination of therapy is possible
  2. Permits localization of drug to the oral cavity for extended period of time.
  3. Ease of administration
  4. Avoids first pass metabolism.
  5. Reduction in dose can be achieved, thereby reducing dose dependent side effects
  6. It allows local modification of tissue permeability, inhibition of protease activity or reduction in immunogenic response, thus selective use of therapeutic agents like peptides, proteins and ionized species can be achieved.
  7. Drugs which are unstable in acidic environment of stomach or destroyed by the alkaline environment of intestine can be given by this route
  8. Drugs which show poor bioavailability by oral route can be administered by this route
  9. It follows passive diffusion, and does not require any activation.
  10. The presence of saliva ensures large amount of water for dissolution of drug unlike in case of rectal and transdermal route.
  11. Drugs with short half life can be administered by this method. (2-8 hrs)  e.g. :- nitroglycerine ( 2 hrs) isosorbide mononitrate ( 2-5 hrs)
  12. From the formulation point of view a thin mucin film exist on the surface of oral cavity.
  13. Provides opportunity to retain delivery system in contact with mucosa for prolonged period of time with the help of mucoadhesive compounds.
  14. The buccal membrane is sufficiently large to allow delivery system to  be placed at different sites on the same membrane for different occasions, if the drug or other excipients cause reversible damage or irritate mucosa.

Disadvantages of Buccal Drug Delivery Systems

  1. Over hydration may lead to formation of slippery surface & structural integrity of the formulation may get disrupted by the swelling & hydration of the bioadhesive polymer.
  2. Eating and drinking may become restricted
  3. There is possibility that Patient may swallow the tablet
  4. The drug contained in swallowed saliva follows the per oral route & advantages of buccal route is lost.
  5. Only drug with small dose requirement can be administered.
  6. Drug which irritate mucosa or have a bitter or unpleasant taste or an obnoxious odour cannot be administered by this route
  7. Drugs which are unstable at buccal  pH cannot be administered by this route.
  8. Only those drugs which are absorbed by passive diffusion can be administered by this route

Ideal Drug Candidates for Buccal Drug Delivery System

  1. Molecular size – 75-600 daltons
  2. Molecular weight between 200-500 daltons.
  3. Drug should be lipophilic or hydrophilic in nature.
  4. Stable at buccal pH.
  5. Taste – bland
  6. Drug should be odourless.
  7. Drugs which are absorbed only by passive diffusion should be used.

Permeability Enhancers

Permeability enhancers are substances added to pharmaceutical formulation in order to increase the membrane permeation rate or absorption rate of coadministered drug.
E.g. : By using di- and tri-hydroxy bile salts, the permeability of buccal mucosa to fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC) increased by 100-200 fold compared to FITC alone.
Applications - Enhance bioavailability of drugs –   5% – 40%
Limitations - May cause potential membrane damage.

Design of Buccal Dosage Form

Matrix Type

The Buccal patch designed in a matrix configuration contains drug, adhesive, and additives mixed together. Bi-directional patches release drug in both the mucosa and the mouth. The structure of the matrix type design is basically a mixture of the drug with the mucoadhesive matrix.

Reserviour Type

The buccal patch designed in a reservoir system contains a cavity for the drug and additives separate from the adhesive. Impermeable backing is applied to control the direction of drug delivery; to reduce patch deformation and disintegration while in the mouth; and to prevent drug loss

Buccal Mucoadhesive Dosage Forms

Three types based on their geometry
  1. single layer device with multidirectional release  significant drug loss due to swallowing
  2. impermeable backing layer is superimposed preventing drug loss into the oral cavity
  3. unidirectional release device, drug loss is minimal achieved by coating every face except contact face


Buccal Formulations

Buccal Tablets

Most commonly investigated dosage form for Buccal drug. Tablets are small, flat, and oval, with a diameter of approximately 5–8 mm. Tablets can be applied to different sites in the oral cavity.
Drawback: Lack of physical flexibility, poor patient compliance

Buccal Patches

Laminates consisting of an impermeable backing layer, a drug-containing reservoir layer, a bioadhesive surface for mucosal attachment. Similar to those used in transdermal drug delivery. Backing layer control the direction of drug release, prevent drug loss, minimize deformation and disintegration

Buccal Films

Most recently developed dosage form for Buccal administration. Preferred over adhesive tablets in terms of flexibility and comfort. Flexible, elastic, and soft, yet adequately strong. Effective in oral disease.

Buccal Gels

Semisolid dosage forms, have the advantage of easy dispersion throughout the oral mucosa. May not be as accurate as from tablets, patches, or films. Poor retention of the gels at the site of application has been overcome by using bioadhesive formulations.

Marketed Products

Oral bioadhesive formulation
Corlan – hydrocartisone succinate
Bonjela – hypromellose
Taktarin – miconazole
Corsodyl – chlorohexidine

Buccal mucosa formulation
Buccaten – nausea , vomiting, virtigo
Suscard -  angina
Sublingual formulation
GTN (Glycerin Trinitrate)

UNIVERSITY FOR GRE less than 1000


Temple University, PA
City College of the City of New York
Northeastern Illinois University
University of Detroit Mercy
University of Arkansas Little Rock
California State University, Fresno
 Alabama A & M University
Widener University, Pennsylvania
Alcorn State University
Gannon University
University of Findlay-Ohio
San Diego State University, California
Ball State University
Northwestern Polytechnic University
Jacksonville State University
Saint Joseph University 
Chapman University
Kent State University
Ferris State University
University of New Haven, CT
Farleigh Dickinson University, New Jersey
State University of New York, Albany
College of William & Mary
East Tennessee State University
Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos
DePaul University
Mc Neese State University
Oakland University
Sam Houston State University
San Jose state University
William Patterson University
Western Carolina University
University of Central Oklahoma
Widener University
University of St Thomas, MN
Western Illinois university
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Delaware State University
State University of New York, New Paltz
Central Michigan University
University of Southern Mississippi
Indian University South Bend
Saint Mary’s University San Antonio
Shippensburg University, PA
East Tennessee State University
University of Texas, Pan America
Jackson State University
Oklahoma City University
Frostburg State University
La Salle University, PA
Alfred University
Monmouth University-New Jersey
Southern New Hampshire University
Roosevelt University Chicago
Drake university
Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania
Duquesne University
Georgia College  & State University
Georgia Southern University
Kennesaw State University
Long Island University
Loyola University Chicago
Northern Kentucky University
Lawrence Tech University
Clark Atlanta University
California State University, Northridge
Catholic University of America, Washington
Ohio Dominican College (University), Ohio
Ferris State University, Michigan
Fitchburg State University, MA
Hawaii Pacific University, Hawaii
Northwood University, Michigan
Johnson and Wales University, RI
Governors State University, Parkway IL
Troy State University, Alabama
Stevens Institute of Technology
Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton
Golden Gate University
Howard University
Dominican University

UNIVERSITY FOR GRE 1000

Universities for GRE 1000
Northwest Missouri State University
Lamar University
 Illinois State University, Normal
University of Louisville
 Texas A & M University, Commerce
Colorado Technical University, Colorado Springs
Boise State university, Idaho
Montana State University, Bozeman
South Dakota School of Mines & technology
North Carolina Agricultural & Tech State University
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Florida International university
North Dakota State University
Western Kentucky University
Bradley University
Cleveland State University
University of Bridgeport –CT
University of Dayton –Ohio
Texas A & M university, Kingsville
University of West Florida, Pensacola
Eastern Michigan University
 Minnesota State University, Mankato
Suffolk University, MA
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
New Mexico Institute of Mining &Tech. 
University of Central Arkansas
Southeastern University, DC
University of Hawaii
University of Texas, Tyler
Eastern Washington University
Southern Oregon University, Ashland
University of Texas at San Antonio
State University of West Georgia
Ball State University
University of Texas El Paso
Columbus State University
Arkansas State University
University of Denver
North Dakota State University
New York Institute of Technology
California State University, Chico
Dakota State University
St Cloud State University
Marquette University